Output frequencies for multiple variables

Usage

tab_counts_items(
  data,
  cols,
  ci = FALSE,
  percent = TRUE,
  values = c("n", "p"),
  labels = TRUE,
  clean = TRUE,
  ...
)

Arguments

data: A tibble containing item measures.
cols: Tidyselect item variables (e.g. starts_with...).
ci: Whether to compute 95% confidence intervals.
percent: Set to FALSE to prevent calculating percents from proportions.
values: The values to output: n (frequency) or p (percentage) or both (the default).
labels: If TRUE (default) extracts labels from the attributes, see codebook.
clean: Prepare data by data_clean.
...: Placeholder to allow calling the method with unused parameters from tab_counts.

Value

A volker tibble.

Examples

library(volker)
data <- volker::chatgpt

tab_counts_items(data, starts_with("cg_adoption_"))
#> 
#> 
#> |Expectations                                                | strongly disagree| disagree|  neutral|    agree| strongly agree|     total|
#> |:-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------:|--------:|--------:|--------:|--------------:|---------:|
#> |ChatGPT has clear advantages compared to similar offerings. |            6% (6)|   8% (8)| 35% (34)| 36% (35)|       14% (14)| 100% (97)|
#> |Using ChatGPT brings financial benefits.                    |          22% (21)| 22% (21)| 30% (29)| 21% (20)|         6% (6)| 100% (97)|
#> |Using ChatGPT is advantageous in many tasks.                |            6% (6)| 10% (10)| 21% (20)| 46% (45)|       16% (16)| 100% (97)|
#> |Compared to other systems, using ChatGPT is more fun.       |            6% (6)|   4% (4)| 36% (35)| 39% (38)|       14% (14)| 100% (97)|
#> |Much can go wrong when using ChatGPT.                       |            6% (6)| 27% (26)| 32% (31)| 22% (21)|       13% (13)| 100% (97)|
#> |There are legal issues with using ChatGPT.                  |          10% (10)| 19% (18)| 41% (40)| 14% (14)|       15% (15)| 100% (97)|
#> |The security of user data is not guaranteed with ChatGPT.   |            3% (3)| 22% (21)| 42% (41)| 19% (18)|       14% (14)| 100% (97)|
#> |Using ChatGPT could bring personal disadvantages.           |          11% (11)| 35% (34)| 29% (28)| 18% (17)|         7% (7)| 100% (97)|
#> |In my environment, using ChatGPT is standard.               |          20% (19)| 34% (33)| 26% (25)| 15% (15)|         5% (5)| 100% (97)|
#> |Almost everyone in my environment uses ChatGPT.             |          27% (26)| 31% (30)| 26% (25)| 10% (10)|         6% (6)| 100% (97)|
#> |Not using ChatGPT is considered being an outsider.          |          46% (45)| 27% (26)| 14% (14)|   7% (7)|         5% (5)| 100% (97)|
#> |Using ChatGPT brings me recognition from my environment.    |          33% (32)| 27% (26)| 21% (20)| 13% (13)|         6% (6)| 100% (97)|
#> 
#> 4 missing case(s) omitted.
#>